America's values and interests are best advanced by sustained
involvement in world affairs by both the public and private sectors.
The expansion of free market economies and rising living standards are
crucial ingredients of political freedom and respect for human rights.
Challenges to US interests and the rule of law should be addressed as
much as possible in concert with our allies and trading partners.
The US Government should adopt a standard of ongoing accountability, so
that unilateral foreign policy sanctions are evaluated by:
-- Whether they achieve their intended results. -- The potential sacrifice of other national interests. -- The costs imposed upon Americans in terms of lost jobs and reduced incomes.
USA*ENGAGE Principles for Sanctions Reform
Congress must take a more deliberative and
disciplined approach to U.S. sanctions policy, so that such measures
are driven by common sense, instead of being pushed to
counter-productive ends by politics and emotion.
U.S.
sanctions policy is broken and needs to be fixed. Unilateral economic
sanctions almost never help the people we want to help and almost
always fail to bring about the actions we seek to promote. By acting
alone, America only insures that its response is ineffective, since a
target country can always circumvent a U.S. unilateral sanction by
working with one of our competitors.
Unilateral
sanctions should be one of the last tools out of America's foreign
policy toolbox, not the first. We need to take a harder look at
alternatives, such as multilateral pressure on rogue regimes and more
effective U.S. diplomacy.
The
indiscriminate use of unilateral sanctions is undermining America's
international competitiveness and economic security. As the Soviet
grain embargo showed, unilateral sanctions cause lasting damage to
America's reputation as a reliable supplier. U.S. sanctions result in
$15 billion to $19 billion annually in lost U.S. exports and deprive
American workers of over 200,000 high-wage jobs.
Unilateral
sanctions should not be used indiscriminately as a one-size-fits-all
solution to every international challenge, particularly when they are
likely to be (1) counter-productive, (2) ineffective, and (3) costly
from the standpoint of U.S. competitiveness.
Sanctions
reform legislation should be enacted to provide for responsible,
common-sense reform of U.S. sanctions policy. Such an approach would:
Establish
a more disciplined and deliberative process for imposing unilateral
U.S. sanctions, including greater consultation between Congress and the
Executive Branch and consideration of alternatives, such as
multilateral pressure and diplomatic initiatives.
Ensure
that Congress and the Executive Branch have adequate information about
the likely effectiveness and economic and humanitarian costs of a
proposed sanction and have conducted a detailed analysis of whether the
proposed sanction is the best tool for achieving U.S. objectives.
Establish regular reporting and sunset requirements, so that sanctions are terminated unless a continuing justification exists.